I take Vitamin D daily now.
I found one of my recent client infographics, The Empowered E-Patient, translated and posted on a Chinese site, www.mazingtech.com (along with many others), but it’s not a version that I designed. I also had to view the site using this link with Google Translate. Someone has downloaded the original image file, translated all of the text into Chinese and then reposted the infographic.
Let me start by saying that although I designed the original infographic, I don’t think I have a big problem with someone else translating it and republishing it without my permission (or involvement) in this way. It was done very well, and the client I designed it for feels the same way.
Here you can see the original and the translated version side-by-side:
You can see that someone spent some time with an image editing program trying to do this right and make it look official. The Chinese text is the same size and color as the original English, and was very carefully positioned. The visuals were left intact, as were all of the logos, website addresses and even the copyright information.
Technically, I think this would be considered a copyright violation, but it’s not like another site is claiming ownership or directing traffic to a new, different destination site. Because of the care that was taken, if this infographic is reaching more people because of the translation, it would be successfully driving more awareness and traffic to the PathOfTheBlueEye.com site. That was the whole point of the original infographic in the first place!
One issue is that because I wasn’t part of the translation process, I don’t know that it was translated correctly. If there actually is some existing demand to view this in Chinese, I could have offered that service to my client to make sure that we were happy with the translation.
It’s worth noting, that there are MANY English infographics that have translated into Chinese on this site, but the navigation to find them is very difficult. Here are a few more from other designers that I have posted before on Cool Infographics, but have been translated and reposted in Chinese. (You can click the titles to see the original English version I posted)
Designed by our friend, Jess Bachman, this one relies heavily on visuals related to the events on the timeline over the last 16 years. A little text heavy for my tastes, but I had forgotten at least half of this stuff that Yahoo! messed up. It’s a little amazing that they’re still as big as they are.
Chris Watson, author of Visualisation Magazine is hosting a contest for all of you. The next issue will be Visualisation: Volume 4 - Handmade Informal, and the contest winner will be featured on the cover (plus featured on the GOOD Magazine blog, the VisualThinkMap blog and here on Cool Infographics). Seriously, ANYONE can enter, and you don’t have to be an expert in any expensive design software or programming languages.
Deadline is the end of December, so you have plenty of time to submit your entry.
Chris has setup a special group on Flickr where anyone can submit their entries.
This is the group to share your submissions for the contest to feature your work on the Cover (front wrapping round to the back), a double page spread and a blog post on GOOD Magazine blog, Vism.ag/blog and CoolInfographics.com.
I want to emphasize handmade techniques like, etching, screen printing, metal press, lino, mono printing, drawn, paper folding. the only digital element would be the capturing of the work for the front cover to send us, or taking printed elements and manipulating them by hand… to an extent.
CHECKOUT THESE PEOPLE FOR INSPIRATION:
Stefan G Bucher
Denis Wood & Siglio Press
VENTURI, SCOTT BROWN AND ASSOCIATES, INC
Visualise any subject you like (try not to be too offensive, would like all ages to appreciate) and to consider the:
TO BE JUDGED
by GOOD Magazine, Density Design, Cool Infographics & Visualisation Magazine
End date: aiming for end of December.
Judging: Beginning of January
Dont’ be intimidated if you’re not an infographic designer by day. This contest is open to everyone who thinks they can tell a good message visually. Judging will be based on these criteria:
Complexity: More complexity doesn’t always equal better infographic. Does the infographic improve understanding of a normally complex topic?
Innovation: Is the visual design method innovative, and visualize the data in a new way?
Culture: Is the infographic relevant to a broad audience in today’s world? Does it have cultural importance?
More details can be found at vism.ag/61
Since I’ll be one of the judges, I can’t enter myself. I will probably post more than just the winner here on the blog. I expect the judging will be tough, and we’ll have a number of really good entries.
Please help spread the word and retweet the contest!
A project I did recently for The Concrete Network visualizes the results of their 2010 Concrete Floor Survey. They have some exclusive research data from consumers, and What Consumers Think About Concrete explores the consumer perceptions of concrete floors and uses visuals to make the information interesting and relevant.
The team at Concrete Network did a great job of taking a boring report filled with bar chart after bar chart, converting that data into an appealing infographic and then integrating those visuals into the report they distribute publicly.
Original survey report:
Public Survey Report PDF:
Images of actual projects were very important to make the concrete floor color choices relevant and understandable.
I also made this project somewhat interactive. Instead of zooming in and moving around a large infographic image, each of the separate data visuals is clickable to view that section in detail. Using textures relevant to the data also makes the resulting visuals interesting and quick to comprehend.
Thanks to Khara and the team at The Concrete Network!
We don’t technically need coffee to survive (though many would argue just the opposite), yet this popular pick-me-up fuels not only our daily energy levels, but the global economy as well. The coffee industry thrives in countries like Brazil, Vietnam and Colombia: the world’s leading coffee exporters. Meanwhile, coffee drinkers around the world love their daily morning brew like no other drink. In the United States alone, we consume more than 66 billion cups of coffee per year. Some of us love our java so much, in fact, that we even observe a national coffee holiday, September 29.
There are a handful of statistics included that aren’t visualized, which does seem odd. For example, “40% of this coffee is now gourmet” could easily have been visualized.
In 2000, the Pew Internet and American Life Project found that 25% of Americans searched online for health information. Today, 61% rely on the Web for medical and health content. Americans’ growing reliance on Dr. Google and Nurse Yahoo! has led to profound changes in how health organizations and providers relate to and communicate with consumers.
Notably, this infographic provides information on e-patient social media communications from a Project-produced research report, “Communicating with the Empowered E-Patient.” This report is available free of charge to individuals making regular contributions to the Project’s knowledge community, Living the Path. Learn more about how to access this report here.
One of the challenges was defining not only what is an e-patient, but also what is the correct term to refer to these people looking up medical information online. We ended up using Google to determine which terms are used most commonly, and the title ‘e-patient” was clearly the term used most often.
What makes an infographic, an infographic?
It’s commonly understood that infographics visualize data. But the question is: at what point data becomes information is where the grey area begins. The following two submissions from CoolInfographics.com readers allow a clearer comparison between interesting presentation of information vs. infographic. As a Dallas-area resident, I couldn’t be happier to present two visualizations about the World Series between the Texas Rangers and the San Francisco Giants. Go Rangers!
Lillian Smith of VerticalBrands.com created the first in our series: 2010 World Series By Numbers (above). A look at the home cities of the two teams dueling it out in the 2010 World Series, the San Francisco Giants and the Texas Rangers from Dallas.
In the spirit of the World Series, MyCheapApartments.com has decided to take a closer look at the two bustling metropolises that this year’s championship contenders call home.
Posted on mycheapapartments.com, this one does a better job of visualizing data. The cities are located on visuals of the states, some housing statistics are in bar charts and even the mascot visuals add to the comparison. There are certainly other statistics included that could also have been visualized, but are only included as text (Show me the map of San Francisco inside the map of Dallas for size comparison). I do like that most of the comparisons are side-by-side for the cities, so the reader can understand the comparisons quickly.
On the other hand is a blog post from the folks at Sterling Satellite: 14 Things You Didn’t Know about the World Series.
My opinion is that this one doesn’t actually qualify as an infographic, because there isn’t any data being visualized. It’s a list of interesting facts presented in a graphic format, but many of the statistics included would have been better understand if they had been visualized (i.e. graph the comparison of advertisement costs).
The World Series is one of the premier events in all of sports, and it is steeped in fascinating facts and figures that will amaze anyone. Here are the 14 things you didn’t know about the World Series (as if you need anything to make you more excited):
What do you think?
Thanks for submitting these. And… Go Rangers!
Whats better than a pumpkin carving? A pumpkin carved with Lasers, that’s what. Having carved pumpkins most of my life, and getting heavily into it in 2008 with my Obama pumpkins. I decided to combine my love of information and pumpkin carving to create the first infographic pumpkin. Long story short, doing it with stencils and by hand was a good waste of three 40lb pumpkins, a dozen hours and a few exacto knife war wounds. As luck would have it though, the very day i was about to throw in the towel I stumbled upon a Microsoft employee who carves pumpkins with lasers. Being that lasers are just about the most awesome thing in the world, i couldn’t pass up seeing if something could be arranged.
11 days, a few setbacks and a trip to the Microsoft campus to deliver a pumpkin and the fruit(that’s right, pumpkin is a fruit) of our labor was complete:
(click to enlarge)
What a fun project. Great job Justin!
Overall, I like this one but The Halloween Report is a mixed bag. Heavy on the illustration, The Halloween Report includes elements like the historical timeline, some pumpkin facts and an analysis of candy corn.
I really like the 21 moons with jack-o-lantern faces, and the pumkpin comparison to the BMW Mini makes a good reference. I like the idea of the candy corn ingredients, but the slices don’t accurately represent the proportions.
I don’t understand the 7x8 visual grid of pumpkins. How does that mean 1.1 billion pounds? The comparison to space shuttles is tough too, because most people don’t have a good feel for how much a space shuttle weighs. I would have continued the BMW Mini comparison and shown how many Minis it takes to weigh 1.1 billion pounds.
Thanks to Aubrey for sending in the link!